Re: NOP instruction

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
15 Dec 1998 18:05:48 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Stefan Monnier: "Re: autofs vs. Sun automount -- new fs proposal"
Previous message: Stefan Monnier: "Re: mmap() is slower than read() on SCSI/IDE on 2.0 and 2.1"
Maybe in reply to: Caffeina et Nutella: "NOP instruction"

Followup to: <199812151439.PAA01120@Eris.it>
By author: Caffeina et Nutella <lomarcan@tin.it>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> XCHG AX, AX (opcode 0x90) was used as a synonym of NOP (NOP was/is
> accepted as NOP -- at least by TASM and is assembled as XCHG AX,AX)
> XCHG doesn't set flags so it's good
>
> BUT, something should be wrong in my manual: XCHG is rated for 3 clock
> ticks on a 486 (Pentium weren't invented yet...) but his 'synonym' NOP
> is rated for only 1 tick....
>

Long time has passed since the 8086. Don't be surprised if some of
the x86 series chips optimize NOP.

-hpa

-- 
    PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD  1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
    See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
        I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
   "To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stefan Monnier: "Re: autofs vs. Sun automount -- new fs proposal"
Previous message: Stefan Monnier: "Re: mmap() is slower than read() on SCSI/IDE on 2.0 and 2.1"
Maybe in reply to: Caffeina et Nutella: "NOP instruction"