Hi,
> Perhaps the enclosed patch (against 2.1.131ac13) would come in useful
> here. It basically adds a configuration option in "Processor type and
> ...
> --- linux/include/asm-i386/page.h.orig Thu Apr 9 02:05:18 1998
> +++ linux/include/asm-i386/page.h Thu Dec 17 20:58:28 1998
have you ever tried it? It can not do anything useful - please read
the comment in linux/include/asm-i386/page.h :
* IF YOU CHANGE THIS, PLEASE ALSO CHANGE
*
* arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
*
* which has the same constant encoded..
But I do not agree that even with this change it's enough - do you (to
all kernel developers) have access to any machine with more than 1G
RAM? Do you tested it with patches you suggest?
We are now running 4/SMP with 1G and except normal patches (more
processes, MegaRAID, ...) we must also apply other patches to make it
work (well, 2.0.29 worked ok, but we loose our power).
I can make all of our patches available somewhere when requested. Any
comments.
-- Pavel Janik ml. Pavel.Janik@inet.cz- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/