Re: /dev/one - why not /dev/repeat?

Dave Cinege (dcinege@psychosis.com)
Tue, 22 Dec 1998 17:23:24 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: The Cyrix MediaGX saga"
Previous message: Marc Espie: "RMS Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Maybe in reply to: Steve VanDevender: "/dev/one - why not /dev/repeat?"

thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:
>
> Are there advantages in having something like /dev/repeat?

Actually yes, I'd liek that more. (And could have used it quite a few times.)

-- http://www.linkscape.net/ Linkscape Internet Services 732-541-4214 http://www.linuxrouter.org/ Linux Router Project

At 19981216.11:59 Zulu, Mach 1 was broken with a 1.0080162GHz Dual CPU machine. I'm the Degenerate Overclocker that did it. http://www.psychosis.com/doa/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: The Cyrix MediaGX saga"
Previous message: Marc Espie: "RMS Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
Maybe in reply to: Steve VanDevender: "/dev/one - why not /dev/repeat?"