=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jeremy Katz | linuxpower.org -- Helping Users Harness
Admin, NCSSM Unix Network | the Power of Linux
katzj@shells.technojunkie.com | http://linuxpower.org
katzj@iname.com | unknwn@linuxpower.org
"Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 rdicaire@vic.com wrote:
> Is it just me or has anyone noticed that the 2.1.132 patch, when applied,
> still shows kernel version as 2.1.131, and that the background title in
> make menuconfig also shows 2.1.131?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/