Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a

Nate Tuck (nate.tuck@raycer.com)
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:11:41 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Nicholas J. Leon: "Re: A very bad report re 2.2.0preX"
Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"
In reply to: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"
Next in thread: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"

At 04:56 AM 1/14/99 +0300, Khimenko Victor wrote:
>INEVITABLE ? Are you joking ?

In a word, yes.

nate

PS - your optimized C class is legal C++ code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nicholas J. Leon: "Re: A very bad report re 2.2.0preX"
Previous message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"
In reply to: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"
Next in thread: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"