Can we please request that kernel.org "branded" distribution sites
behave the same way? I really don't like having to untangle the effects
of applying a DOS/ascii patch. I don't like having to remember to check
on formats after a download. I don't like having to run the patch
through dos2unix.
I don't care what a mirror does on it's own, but if it's mentioned in
the
"official mirrors list", it should meet some standard of compatibility
or at least explain in clear language how it works...that's clear
language to the upcomming linux masses, not somebody with 5-10 years of
unix administration experience. BTW, I don't care about last weeks
issue of .gz vs .bz2 because that's reasonably obvious.
jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/