Re: Status of ROOT_NFS feature?
Kelly French (kfrench@unitedis.com)
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 08:56:21 -0500 (EST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: problems with looped extended partitions"
- Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
Shoudn't the root device be 0,255? It looks like you have 0,0.
For me, I do:
mknod /dev/nfsroot c 0 255
rdev /path/to/kernel/vmlinuz /dev/nfsroot
I've been using nfsroot on 2.1.131.
-kf
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Ruben Schattevoy wrote:
> > VFS: cannot open root device 00:00
> > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
> Ruben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: problems with looped extended partitions"
- Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
- Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"