Re: [RFC] What should we do with FAT inode numbers?

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@noris.de)
24 Jan 1999 13:44:16 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
Previous message: Thomas Quinot: "Re: 2.2.0-final"

Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi> writes:
>
> cluster indices, and unless the file *physically* moves,
> the head of the chain stays put, never mind possible renames
> et.al. even unlink won't change that value (thus fstat() will
> be stable for unlinked files too!)
>
Won't work for zero-length files.

-- Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf@noris.de | ICQ: 20193661 The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://www.noris.de/~smurf/

-- My folks didn't come over on the Mayflower, but they were there to meet the boat.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: User vs. Kernel (was: To be smug, or not to be smug, that is , the question)"
Previous message: Thomas Quinot: "Re: 2.2.0-final"