Re: Structure vs purism ?

ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:08:36 +0100


On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 04:02:20PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> If you get RAM that runs at twice cache-speed you won't need a cache
> (there will probably always be an instruction cache so branch prediction
> works).

MP systems are getting more and more popular. For them the requirement for
caches will continue to exist. Even Cray started to using instruction
caches for the SV vectors; good 'ole Seymour would probably commit suicide
if he'd know that ;-) Large efforts in CPU and bus systems over the last
years has gone into technique which allows to tolerate latencies. The
R10000 is one example; probably the most interesting ideas are being used in
Tera's proprietary architecture of a multithreaded CPU. The actual hope is
that these techniques combined with faster RAM technologies of the future
will provide a short enough latency to allow CPUs to keep busy most of the
time.

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/