> yes, there is no atomic_inc_and_test() yet. (it's a bit tricky to
_Where_ do you want to run atomic_inc_and_test()? On random kernel data
where incidentally a long time ago there was the just deallocated
and reused (somewhere else) mm_struct?
If we incidentally access the mm_struct and we notice that the mm->count
is zero it menas we are just buggy.
> sign flag.) Also note that this is all fiction yet because we _are_
> holding the kernel lock for these situations in 2.2.
Sure it's finction, but _all_ complains I get against my s/atomic_t/int/
was about the future.
Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/