Re: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'?

Robert Wuest (rwuest@sire.ddns.org)
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:51:30 +0000


Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Well, actually, it is. Anyone who can afford any computer at all
> can afford a few gigabytes these days.

That's not necessarily true. I work with a bunch of guys who make very
little money and are always scrounging parts to enhance their machines.
$200 for a disk drive is two weeks salary.

This is in Mexico where the scholarnet project is trying to put Linux in
140,000 schools and other computing centers and I work in an area where
wages are "high". The people trying to come up with this many computers
in Mexico are going to be doing a lot of scrounging old hardware with
little money to enhance machines. And those kids are going to take home
a desire to run (and grow into hackers) on Linux in a home environment
where wages are often less than $1/hr.

I personally could deal with the kernel if it grows to twice the current
size, but keeping it as small as possible is very __important__ for
Linux's expansion onto the desktop in developing nations and hence,
important for developers to keep in mind. Just a thought.

Robert

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/