> I promised and promise again, if someone will explain why
> he needs subnet proxy arp, it will be ready the next evening.
I don't know why, I have never seen a use for it that couldn't be solved
with routing table changes @)
> What's about different outputs of "arp -a":
> ceratinly, it is deal of taste, but to my not-very-well breed taste,
> 2.1 gives much nicer and intelligible output. 8)8)
What do you mean?
> PS Hurra! I understood why I send empty messages sometimes!
> I hope, previous one is the last one.
Cool.
-Andi
P.S.: I hope your don't limit ICMPs to localhost patch makes it in soon -
the problem bite me just recently.
-- This is like TV. I don't like TV.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/