Re: return of flawed amd processor?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Some questions..."
• Previous message: ki@kretz.co.at: "Re: Linux 2.0.37pre7"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] sleep_on() done with cli() in the NFS code, 2.2.2"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] sleep_on() done with cli() in the NFS code, 2.2.2"

>Has anyone succeded in getting a flawed amd processor replaced (the
>bug that causes unstability with more than 64 MB, reported by the
>kernel)? If so, i would be interesting in hearing about it as I have
>not been able to get anything out of 'em.
>
>At least Intel replaced my p66 back then...

Specifically what processors are affected?
K5/K6/K6-2/K6-2CTX/K6-3?

Which steppings, etc?

--
Mike A. Harris                   Linux advocate      GNU advocate
Computer Consultant                          Open Source advocate  

News for nerds, stuff that matters:           http://slashdot.org


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Some questions..."
• Previous message: ki@kretz.co.at: "Re: Linux 2.0.37pre7"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] sleep_on() done with cli() in the NFS code, 2.2.2"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] sleep_on() done with cli() in the NFS code, 2.2.2"