> On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Kamran Karimi wrote:
>
> > Albert, now you are getting the picture here. I used to discuss the
> > technical issues before, but that was because I thought I was taking part
> > in a genuine techincal discussion. Unfortunately this proved not to be the
> > case.
> >
> > Most of the people opposing DIPC have never even looked at the
> > documentaion, much less the code itself. The problem is, they think they
> > are wiser than the rest of us, and have this divine obligation to save
> > the Linux kernel from bloating.
> [snip]
>
> This isn't the first time thats happened. <cough cough>Solar's no-exec
> stack<cough cough>
Bad example.. the solar patch only offered limmited protection and Linus
demontrated a much more efficiant method that was much less expensive.
Gerhard
-- gmack@imag.netAs a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/