[isn't it OT by now???] Re: 2.2.3 has bad interactivity performance.

Tomasz Przygoda (tprzyg@securities.com)
Tue, 09 Mar 1999 23:32:38 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gary Lawrence Murphy: "Linux on CTV National News!"
Previous message: Tom Tom Tom: "Kernel 2.2.x and ext2 fs"
Maybe in reply to: Lenart Gabor: "2.2.3 has bad interactivity performance."

Hmmm... strange enogh for me both 2.2.2 + gc patche and 2.2.3 look and feel the
same (1GB RAM 4-way Xeon + 120GB RAID with make -j bzImage is "easy" enough on
the box so that I can still login, see a load avg. of >=90 and run couple of
other things :)

-- Tomek,
"A sufficiently primitive malloc(3) is indistinguishable from memory leak."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Securities, Inc. phone (617) 204-3100
695 Atlantic Ave. Suite 400, Boston MA 02111 fax. (617) 204-3101

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gary Lawrence Murphy: "Linux on CTV National News!"
Previous message: Tom Tom Tom: "Kernel 2.2.x and ext2 fs"
Maybe in reply to: Lenart Gabor: "2.2.3 has bad interactivity performance."