> any facts and details ? just a "it's not our fault" is not much
> evidence (on any side).
At least I have the attention of StarOffice boys now. Sorry if I had to
scream loudly and publically. I tried to contact StarDiv and all I got was
a stinky marketdroid e-mail telling me to phone them. I can't do that
unfortunately since I'm deaf.
> please keep in mind when SO 5.0 was released! at least at that time
> glibc 2.0 and pre-2.1 have been so full of compatibility problems that
> I believe the SO (Netscape, Applix, Orcale, ...) boys that there was
> no chance not using glibc 2.0.7.
When you were developing, you should have subscribed to alpha-glibc and
glibc mailing lists - they might have helped to give answers
> anyway, what has to be taken care of to use glibc 2.0 to build
> 2.1-proof applications ? are there any docs, FAQs, hints, ... ?
You have to stop using 2.0 specific features and use features that are
common to both glibc versions.
I think recompiling with the glibc-2.1 libraries should do the trick
(trying to compile should show up most of the problems and then it's a
simple matter to modify)
Cheers,
Alex
-- /_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *Updated* New additions in Humour section
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/