Re: 2.0 a lot better than 2.2 on high-latency links.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David L. Parsley: "Re: caps in elf, next itteration (the hack get's bigger)"
• Previous message: David Lang: "Re: ext3 to include capabilities?"
• In reply to: Rogier Wolff: "2.0 a lot better than 2.2 on high-latency links."

>
> Hi,
>
> I've just tested copying a 0.5Mb file over a 2000ms latency link:
>
>
> 2000 ms net-latency 1ms net-latency.
> from OS:
> 2.0.33 2.2.1
>
> to OS: 2.0.36 84.9 182.7
> 2.2.5 70.8 197.4 1.0
>
> Time, in seconds to transfer file.

Are 2.2.1 and 2.2.5 different machines ?

--
gmack@imag.net

As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David L. Parsley: "Re: caps in elf, next itteration (the hack get's bigger)"
• Previous message: David Lang: "Re: ext3 to include capabilities?"
• In reply to: Rogier Wolff: "2.0 a lot better than 2.2 on high-latency links."