Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap

V Ganesh (ganesh@vxindia.veritas.com)
Sat, 17 Apr 1999 04:28:47 +0530 (IST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David L. Parsley: "Re: caps in elf headers: use the sticky bit!"
Previous message: Dag Wieers: "Re: Module Question"
Maybe in reply to: V Ganesh: "bad lmbench numbers for mmap"
Next in thread: David Miller: "Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap"

> From: David Miller <davem@twiddle.net>
[snip]
> lat_mmap test? It should be in the results/sparc64-linux/xxxx files
> lmbench made as it ran.

here they are:
"mappings
0.524288 677
1.048576 1193
2.097152 2189
4.194304 4379
8.388608 8993
16.777216 17745
33.554432 35039

I tried several runs and got very similar numbers. This is from the ultra5
running 2.2.2

and this is from the ultra5 running solaris 2.6
"mappings
0.524288 340
1.048576 526
2.097152 923
4.194304 1745
8.388608 4134
16.777216 9321

again, pretty repeatable.

ganesh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David L. Parsley: "Re: caps in elf headers: use the sticky bit!"
Previous message: Dag Wieers: "Re: Module Question"
Maybe in reply to: V Ganesh: "bad lmbench numbers for mmap"
Next in thread: David Miller: "Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap"