Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap

David Miller (davem@twiddle.net)
Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:38:59 -0700


Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 04:59:30 +0530 (IST)
From: V Ganesh <ganesh@vxindia.veritas.com>

> At least it is consistant with the fact that the solaris run had to
> touch roughly half as much memory during the benchmark than Linux did.

not really, unless I'm really mistaken.

You're of course right. I think Jakub's profiling results show where
the possible problem is.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/