Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap

Jakub Jelinek (jj@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz)
Sat, 17 Apr 1999 09:32:52 +0200 (CEST)

> I don't see that this problem should be anything new.
> Have we ever been any good at lat_mmap?

I have numbers that we have been. With 2.1.103 on a 167MHz Ultra1 I got 1505
usec, with 2.2.5 on a 249MHz Ultra2 I got ~58000 usec. That's a huge
difference.

Cheers,
Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz
Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
___________________________________________________________________
UltraLinux | http://ultra.linux.cz/ | http://ultra.penguin.cz/
Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/