Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 24 Apr 1999 01:26:45 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Daniel Silverstone: "Re: K7 SMP"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"
Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"

> > made me suspect the backlog. But it's just a guess.
>
> Its partly the packet backlog. This is why I dumped the whole NFR discussion

Erp - I mean its partly the _socket_ backlog - thats not the same as the
bh backlog.

The perils of trying to catch up with 2500 emails

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Silverstone: "Re: K7 SMP"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"
Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: http://www.nfr.net/nfr/mail-archive/nfr-users/1999/Feb/0110.html"