> What seemed negative to me was how he said NT was bad and Linux
> was worse. That he considers Linux *worse* than NT was rather
> surprising.
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to find that he didn't, but the
magazine's sub-editor is a devoted NT fan who changed it to read that
way, and the editor didn't spot the change...
I've seen just this happen in the past, so know how easy it is...
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/