> > You are having year-429496 problem with your date encoding, through
> > ;-))))). (I do not much care what encoding of version you use. It has
> Actually it should be looked into before the year 9999 AD
> I'll make the date the minor version, then sometime before 9999 they can
> raise the major number and expand that one field. I hope that 32bit
> computers are really considered obsolete way before 9999;->
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2550.txt
Excellent preparation, that RFC.
-- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/