I agree with Thomas that a people voiceing their objection to
LinuxHQ.org over what they give you when you go to learn about Linux
[for the newbie]. But it is mute now, as they did change thier page...
So lets not light our soapboxes on fire quite yet. You saw a NEW
version of the page. It does not mean that Thomas is lying, and you
pretty much suggest it in here. Maybe a slower, benefit of the doubt
approach is better than a witch-hunt.
> 2) I would hope that the open source community, of all people, won't get
> involved in the domain name legal wars that, for example, Microsoft have
> been playing (eg, making ntinternals.com change their name), or the stupid
> second-guess games whereby Chase, for example, registered chasesucks.com to
> stop others doing it.
>
> Anyway, surely the worst that can happen if someone finds an unacceptable
> site is that they refuse to hand over good money for such a shameful
> product. Maybe they might even decide to copy it and give it to their
> friends, to deprive the evil Linux Corporation of further revenue. That
> would be terrible !
>
> Nick Brown, Strasbourg, France (Nick(dot)Brown(at)coe(dot)int)
>
--
Joshua Schmidlkofer
[ -- Linux Evangelist -- ]
devfs for 2.2, it makes you invincible
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/kernel-patches.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/