> We're up with 2.3.3 plus Andi Kleen's tcp_do_sendmsg patch plus Apache
> sleeping in accept() on one production server, and comparing it against a
> 2.2.7 plus tcp_do_sendmsg patch plus Apache sleeping in flock(). Identical
> systems (dual PII450, 1G, two disk controllers).
>
> As far as I can *tell*, the wake-one patch is definitely doing its stuff:
> the 2.2.7 machine still has cycles of load into three figures, and the 2.3.3
> machine hasn't actully managed a load of 1 yet.
>
> UNFORTUNATELY, observation suggests that the 2.3.3 machine/Apache
> combination is dropping/ignoring about one connection in ten, maybe more.
> (Network error: connection reset by peer.)
>
> As far as I can *see* there's nothing in either Apache error log (for either
> httpd), and it is quite often missing the proxy reauest from localhost to
> localhost:8989 (proxying the mod_perl ad).
>
> Thoughts?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/