Re: Migrating to larger numbers

David Wragg (dpw@doc.ic.ac.uk)
01 Jun 1999 23:11:38 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: C. Scott Ananian: "Re: /dev/random and /dev/psaux: too much entropy assumed?"
Previous message: David Whysong: "Re: /dev/random and /dev/psaux: too much entropy assumed?"

Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:
> C9x does not even have a final draft yet, not to speak of a standard.
> It is very likely to become C0x too. I wouldn't call not supporting a not
> existing standard broken.

According to discussions on comp.std.c, the final committee draft went
out several weeks ago. I don't know what the voting schedule is, but
it seems likely it will become C99 unless a national body rejects.

David Wragg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: C. Scott Ananian: "Re: /dev/random and /dev/psaux: too much entropy assumed?"
Previous message: David Whysong: "Re: /dev/random and /dev/psaux: too much entropy assumed?"