> As these tests are quite crude -- i should have tried iozone, bonnie
> or smthing. This was just a fast, coffee-break type of benchmark (tm) -- i am
> all ears for proposals, but the figures are _so_ blatantly different...
>
As far as I've gathered, the results will depend quite heavily on the
disk access speeds (and hence your hardware) since the amount of
server-side readahead is supposed to depend on whether Solaris thinks
you're doing sequential block access or random access on the file.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/