Re: removing the global lock from sys_brk()

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Fri, 4 Jun 1999 19:45:28 +0200 (CEST)


On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Chuck Lever wrote:

>turns out, no global lock is necessary in do_brk(); both the

Fine.

>without the global lock. it's the general cases that appear in routines
>like mremap() that still need protection. i just didn't optimize the

Of course. I was talking only about the lock_kernel() in do_brk() (the
snapshot of code quoted by Linus).

For sys_mremap() the lock_kernel is needed before calling both
functions, because you can't assume as in sbrk that the mapping is
anonymous.

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/