Re: stable kernel macro?

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Sat, 05 Jun 1999 20:51:33 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard Gooch: "[PATCH] devfs v99.2 available"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.x instabilities"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "stable kernel macro?"

In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906060045270.11179-100000@ps.cus.umist.ac.uk>, Riley
Williams writes:
+-----
| > Is there a generic way to detect, via the C pre-processor,
| > whether the kernel is a stable or experimental series?
|
| I don't know about "via the C pre-processor", but you could try one of
| the following bash commands:
+--->8

#ifdef LINUX_VERSION_CODE
#define LINUX_STABLE_KERNEL (!(LINUX_VERSION_CODE & 0x000100))
#else
#error kernel is too old
#endif

-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "[PATCH] devfs v99.2 available"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.x instabilities"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "stable kernel macro?"