> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Nathan Hand wrote:
> > If devfs is so bad, could we have reasons why. Policy isn't a good
> > reason (the policy's already in Documentation/devices.txt).
>
> Fear. Ignorance. Resistance to change. Not having read the documentation
> or actually tried devfs. Etc.
What exactly does hpa refer to when he says 'policy'? It's pretty vague
to me.
I've been using devfs for a while now. The only real problems I have with
it are that changes to ownership and permissions are not inherently
persistent and the chicken and the egg problem between device files and
modules.
>
> > If you're claiming names->devices are policy, but numbers->devices
> > are not, then I'm confused and bewildered.
>
> Me too. Boggle.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
------------------------------------------------((\))<----------------------
Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as
inkblot@geocities.com sticky.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/M/S/O d-@ s-:- a--->- C++ UL++++BS++>$ P+>+++ L+++>+++++$ W+ N !o
K- w(---)$>-- M-(--) V(--) PS+ PE Y+ PGP>++ t(+)@ 5 X@ R tv>! b+>+++ DI++
D e>++(+++) h r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/