Re: massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10?

Kastus Shchuka (pike@usis.minsk.by)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:24:39 +0300 (EET DST)


On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Rogier Wolff wrote:

> Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> >
> > > Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> > > > Just a short question to all people who exrerienced corruption: What kind
> > > > of RAM do you use? Is it ECC/parity or no? This looks like the clue to the
> > > > problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > NO! At least some of them have verified that the problems DO NOT originate
> > > in "bad RAM".
> >
> > One can't say that memory contains no errors unless RAM has parity/ECC.
> >
> > Non-parity SIMMs/DIMMs are cheaper but no chance to be confident it works
> > without errors. Even tests can't prove it.
>
> There are tests that prove that the RAM works.
>
> The ones I don't trust are the memory tests.

...like memtest, CheckIt

>
> The one that I do trust is "compiling the kernel 100 times in a
> row". If that completes without any incidents 100 times in a row, the
> RAM is good.

Completely agree.

>
> Read
> http://www.BitWizard.nl/sig11/

Thanks for the pointer.

>
> Roger.
>
>
>
> --
> ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
> *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
> ------ Microsoft SELLS you Windows, Linux GIVES you the whole house ------
>

--------------------------------------------
Kastus Shchuka <pike@usis.minsk.by>
LAN Manager/SysAdmin ph.: +375-17-217-0481
USIS Minsk fax: +375-17-217-8828

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/