> compared with 2*27 perfect kernel builds with 2.2.5, now I'm pretty sure
> it's not a hardware bug on my side.
update: I'm no longer sure that it's a kernel problem in my case.
after reducing the CPU clock from 450 to 400 MHz I've now compiled
>2*100 kernels using 2.2.10 with no single problem at all.
so maybe it was just a hardware problem for me -- or it's some weird race
which doesn't show up for 400 but only for 450 MHz ?! I can't believe that yet...
Harald
--
All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
\ \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\
\ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|//
Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \
koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ^^^^^ ^^^^^
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/