RE: 2.2.10 oops (buggy Cyrix CPUs)

Woodhouse Ian (ian.woodhouse@hyder.com)
Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:18:41 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hans Reiser: "I think I was badly misunderstood, it's all optional.... (was Re: Summary of how linux can best avoi"
Previous message: Stefan Arentz: "Question about Ip Masquerading (sk_buff)"

On the subject of Cyrix Pxxx+ CPUs and bugs, I note that there are
twins running around bearing the IBM name rather than Cyrix.
Rumour suggests that these are more reliable that the Cyrix editions.

I find this odd since I believe many Cyrix's were made at IBM plants.

Does anyone else's experience demonstrate this?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans Reiser: "I think I was badly misunderstood, it's all optional.... (was Re: Summary of how linux can best avoi"
Previous message: Stefan Arentz: "Question about Ip Masquerading (sk_buff)"