Re: Synchronous board drivers

Paul Mackerras (paulus@cs.anu.edu.au)
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:45:42 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: nice troll (was: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense)"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: nice troll (was: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense)"
Maybe in reply to: Krzysztof Halasa: "Synchronous board drivers"

> Ok. But bear in mind the general code needs to be flexible enough for this.
> That really means that drivers should be able to become and leave ppp easily
> and that they should be deciding their policy not the ppp code - easy
> enough, and thatis how the current syncppp layer works

OK. Sounds to me like we are in violent agreement. :-)

Paul.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: nice troll (was: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense)"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: nice troll (was: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense)"
Maybe in reply to: Krzysztof Halasa: "Synchronous board drivers"