> >And templates remain dangerous bloat-generating territory.
>
> Pardon me, but that's simply FUD. Dangerous, maybe, at least for
> someone that doesn't really understand templates.
Oddly, I'd argue that templates are pretty safe, certainly w.r.t. types.
> Bloat-generating,
> definitely not.
Definitely bloat generating. Each time you use a template with a different
type, the compiler has to effectively make a new class, complete with all
code, for that type. That's a pretty good definition of bloat IMHO.
-- Death is only a state of mind.Only it doesn't leave you much time to think about anything else.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/