Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!)

Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch)
07 Jul 1999 14:48:24 +0200


>>>>> "Bjorn" == Bjorn Wesen <bjorn@sparta.lu.se> writes:

Bjorn> On 7 Jul 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> You still haven't explained why a syscall/sysctl is needed for this
>> when all the information can be obtained by parsing /proc/cpuinfo

Bjorn> otoh, all the sys parameters are in /proc/sys as well. i guess
Bjorn> cpuinfo was left out in the cold because its typically
Bjorn> read-only ? but still, its not like sysctl and proc are
Bjorn> completely orthogonal..

Since it is read only there isn't really any reason to provide two
interfaces to the exact same information as far as I can see. Except
of course if one believes in bloating the kernel for the sake of
bloating.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/