Re: smbfs lossage with NT file servers

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 22:31:05 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Steven Roberts: "[OT] Was: Re: linux headers and C++"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Ooops: 2.2.10-ac8 + ncr53c8xx driver"

> 2.2.5-15) if I use smbmount to mount a filesystem from an NT server,
> the date stamps are completely screwed up. I assume that this is
> because the flavor of date stamps that NT uses don't happen to be
> correctly supported by my kernel.

Correct. 2.2.10 gets this right, as does 2.2.5 if you build it without the
WIN95 bug fix. This got discussed a fair bit recently and Tridge submitted
stuff to eliminate the current mess and do it right for all cases

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Steven Roberts: "[OT] Was: Re: linux headers and C++"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Ooops: 2.2.10-ac8 + ncr53c8xx driver"