Re: POSIX.1b timers comments

Thomas Sailer (sailer@ife.ee.ethz.ch)
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:07:15 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Nance: "Re: Linux 2.2.5: write() atomic but not fair."
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] A little wad of patches for 2.3.10"
Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "POSIX.1b timers comments"

Also, clock_getres seems to be very pessimistic,
the resolution is at least 10us, and even better
on Pentium-class or better machines...

Tom

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jim Nance: "Re: Linux 2.2.5: write() atomic but not fair."
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [PATCH] A little wad of patches for 2.3.10"
Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "POSIX.1b timers comments"