> On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> >If you do decide to try ikd, and use gcc-2.95 (or ~recent snapshot),
> >you will need the below incremental patch.
>
> Thanks for the patch. It wasn't needed for us since the caller is
> implemented in asm, but in general the caller need to know when an extern
> function is going to remove the parameter from the stack himself.
>
> Which is the exact complain from the compiler? Does it break the
> compilation complaining about two different declaration of the function?
Yup, exactly.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/