> >* register_console(CON_PRINTBUFFER) could use the wrong msg_level for
> >the first line.
> I think you are wrong. The current code seems fine.
After a wrap-around, the first line could be incomplete. This means that
the first line does not start with a "<?>", and thus the line "msg_level
= buf[1] - '0';" is not perfect. [I use default_message_loglevel for a
incomplete first line]. It's not important.
Btw, what about adding something like this to your IKD kernel?
>>>>>>>>>
--- 2.3/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h Sat Jun 26 11:52:55 1999
+++ build-2.3/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h Thu Aug 12 19:27:00 1999
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
* <linux/spinlock.h> with all of this. Oh, well.
*/
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) do {
local_irq_save(flags); spin_lock(lock); } while (0)
-#define spin_lock_irq(lock) do {
local_irq_disable(); spin_lock(lock); } while (0)
+#define spin_lock_irq(lock) do { unsigned long
flags; local_irq_save(flags); if( (flags&(1<<9)) ==0) printk("spinlock
bad: %lxh\n",lock); spin_lock(lock); } while (0)
#define spin_lock_bh(lock) do {
local_bh_disable(); spin_lock(lock); } while (0)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) do {
local_irq_save(flags); read_lock(lock); } while (0)
<<<<<<<<<
I tried this, and I only found the spin_lock_irq(&runqueue_lock) -call
in sched.c, line 679.
[This is not a bug. do_bottom_half always returns with interrupts
disabled even if it was
called with interrupts enabled.]
-- Manfred
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/