Re: Amanda VFAT Incremental Backups Broken in linux-2.2.1[12]

Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 11:36:36 +0400 (MSD)


In <9e86d1b443edfd13@home-box.demon.co.uk> Robert de Bath (rd103983@home-box.demon.co.uk) wrote:
> DONT BACKUP VFAT INCREMENTALLY

> There is only one date on a file on a VFAT partition and as every command
> down to the DOS copy command preserves that date you cannot see what's
> been changed.

This is WRONG. VFAT (but NOT plain old MS-DOS FAT !!!) has three times as it
should be: Modification time (this is old good MS-DOS "modification time";
preserved by copy), Creation time (not preserved by copy) and "Last access
time" (date actual -- time is not stored; not preserved by copy). At least it
is on disk -- I'm not sure if Linux's VFAT driver supports them...

> Hopefully the ctime is being set to now (or now-1); this is the
> _right_ thing to do.

Why so ? Why not use existing three times ? Even if "Last access time" is not
time but date...

> There is a good feature of VFAT (I _DONT_ believe it !!! a GOOD feature in
> VFAT!!!!!!!) in the archive bit. This would provide reliable incrememtal
> backups ... but it can't be mapped onto Unix semantics.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/