Re: > 15,000 Simultaneous Connections

(no name) ((no email))
08 Sep 1999 08:32:47 -0400

>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Nordwick <nordwick@erdos.askjeeves.com> writes:
> I/O you just want to wait for anything to come in, but for thread termination
> you may either want to wait for a single thread to terminate or all of
> the threads you are interested to terminate. This added complexity is

Of course, not. This kind of design leads to madness (so I assume that it's
the win32 approach and that's why you hate it):
You just want to wait for a single thread to terminate.
The `wait for all threads' case can easily be reproduced on top of it.
KISS.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/