> > Some month ago I pointed out that the checksum 686 can buffer overflow if
> > the start of the buf&1 is != 0.
>
> And some months ago somebody pointed out that it wasn't true. I don't know
> who is right.
also some months ago somebody (who happened to be the implementor of that
unrolled 686 loop) pointed out that the 128-byte unrolling is suboptimal
as well.
-- mingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/