Re: [patch] longstanding chksum patch

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:26:17 +0200 (CEST)


On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu wrote:

>also some months ago somebody (who happened to be the implementor of that
>unrolled 686 loop) pointed out that the 128-byte unrolling is suboptimal
>as well.

My machine was faster with the 128-byte unrolled loop.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/