AFAIK, those cards are _not_ standing for parallel working but routing
interface, so I can't see advantage on using different IRQ here
in some monolithic approach.IMHO 2 solutions are viable here:
1.Four modules with disparate IRQ per segment
(where btw you'll have to face hardware collisions)
(I gonna be flamed with this one ...for sure : ) ).
2.One big big module with 1 IRQ for the whole interfaces.
> If the processing isnt a tiny period you'd probably use a
> bottom half - The
> network layer for example grabs and queues packets on
> interrupt and processes
> them on the bh.
Could you be more specific on which basic handler to be used ?
Fabian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/