"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:37:09 -0300, Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
> <jcastro@appi.com.br> said:
>
> > Couldn't there be a kernel option (maybe tunable by /proc/something)
> > through wich the kernel could grant a limited amount of mlock-able
> > memory for each non-root process? This could default to 0 but be
> > increased when sensitive software is being used.
>
> It needs to be per-user, not just per-process, but yes this would be a
> useful thing to do. The beancounter patches floating about already
> implement a lot of the necessary framework for this.
Can you pass us a link? And what are these patches for?
--------------2EAF141E46F1048729FDFDFA
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="jcastro.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jcastro.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Castro;Juan
tel;work:55 (21) 540-9100
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.appi.com.br/jcastro
org:APPI Informática Ltda.;Desenvolvimento
adr:;;Av. Ataulfo de Paiva, 135/1410;Rio de Janeiro;RJ;22449-900;Brazil
version:2.1
email;internet:jcastro@appi.com.br
title:Consultor
note:One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX!
x-mozilla-cpt:;28896
fn:Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
end:vcard
--------------2EAF141E46F1048729FDFDFA--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/