Re: Why is chmod(2)?

Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de)
Sun, 26 Sep 1999 05:33:24 +0200


In article <7sgp30$jrp$1@verrine.demon.co.uk> you wrote:
> Having the sort of semantics that require this sort of fiddling just gets in
> the way, and I'm not convinced it gains anything.

Well, it gains you somethign if you cant read the files as root on default
unless you have a special capability, say "ignore file access restrictions".
This is exactly what the capabilities is used for. You dont need that
capability usually... back process is a good exception.

Greetings
Bernd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/