> Having the following in Config.in is _not broken:
>
> if [ "$ARCH" = "ppc"]
> bool "foo" CONFIG_SOME_RANDOM_THING
> fi
> if [ "$ARCH" = "mips"]
> bool "bar" CONFIG_SOME_RANDOM_THING
> fi
It *is* broken because it's missing the "then" keyword.
> Is _not_ broken as long as the condition cannot invoke the question
> twice. This is just one example of brokenness in the menu based config
> programs.
As far as that part goes, you try designing and implementing a semantics
for a random-execution config language. It's harder than it looks.
We are actually on the same side here, I think. We both want real
semantics and real error reporting.
Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/