[...]
> I can't imagine why. That's like deciding to rewrite the kernel so it
> doesn't require GCC to build. AS86 was just a TOOL! We try to use the
> appropriate tool for various purposes when the need arises. The
> appropriate tool to assemble Intel mnemonics is one that understands
> Intel. GAS does not. GAS doesn't even know the way Intel assembly
> should be written, i.e., destination operand first.
intel doesn't know which way operands should be written, etc. Just like the
war between little- and bigendians.
The AT&T syntax is sort of standard in the Unix world. It is what the
native Linux assembler uses, so to use intel syntax in a piece of the
kernel, and AT&T syntax in the rest, was just plain confusing. Plus a
separate tool was needed just for building the kernel, plus the need to
mess with an obsolete object format.
-- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/