> this assumption is wrong - there are a couple of cases where sys_XXX()
> functions are called - sys_oldumount(), sys_creat().But there is no reason
> why they shouldn't be changed to use inlined _syscallX()'d things to be
> consistent, is there?
why this vendetta against using sys_ functions directly? We dont go
through a trap because in most cases that is unnecessery overhead. You are
not being logical i think.
-- mingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/